Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Donahue v. Missoula Assessment Sanction Center et al
as 9:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott Donahue
Defendant:
Missoula Assessment Sanction Center, Montana Department of Corrections, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Kenneth Bradshaw, Ariel Monge, Unknown Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Baltzell et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Jeneva Cotton, Schneider, Brian Schuetter and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M'wanza v. Byrna et al
as 3:2016cv00590
Defendant:
Ashdown, Warden R. Baker, J. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Tacuma J. M'wanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milovan Urosevic v. Correction Corp. of America, et al
as 16-16706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILOVAN RAJKO UROSEVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, named as Correctional Corporation of America (CCA), UNKNOWN DONAHUE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Camacho v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00797
Defendant:
Aramek, Baker, Century Link and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Camacho, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dietzmann v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Chief Donahue
Plaintiff:
Bart W Dietzmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moss v. Cullen et al
as 4:2011cv04706
Plaintiff:
Eric Moss
Defendant:
V. Cullen, W. Rodriguez, E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donahue v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Donahue
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Owens, Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomez v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv01176
Plaintiff:
Timoteo Gomez
Defendant:
Donahue and Ayers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
