Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SMITH et al., v. PARKER ET AL.,
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith, Tiakendra Berry and Estate of Lavetria Deshawn Hudson
Defendant:
Justin Lee Parker, JP Express Co LLC, Meherrin Agriculture & Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Means et al v. DeSoto Parish et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
David B. Means, Ryan Dupree, Robert G. Burford and others
Defendant:
DeSoto Parish, DeSoto Parish Police Jury, Parish of DeSoto and others
Amicus Curiae:
Legal Defense Fund, Louisiana State Conference of the N A A C P and DeSoto Parish Branch of the N A A C P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. HARRIS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2018cv00106
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY GEORGIA , CRYSTAL GAIL GARREN , DANIEL LEVAR MADDOX and others
Plaintiff:
JOANN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FPC FINANCIAL FSB v. BERBER FERTILIZER COMPANY et al
as 5:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
FPC FINANCIAL FSB
Defendant:
BERBER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DONALD BARBER and RONALD BARBER
FPC Financial, f.s.b. v. Barber Fertilizer Company et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
FPC Financial, f.s.b., FPC Financial, f.s.b. and FPC Financial, f.s.b.
Defendant:
Barber Fertilizer Company, Donald Barber and Ronald Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Barber v. Kinker et al
as 4:2009cv01516
Plaintiff:
Donald Barber
Defendant:
Amy Kinker, Ben Burkemper, Dan Dildine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARBER et al v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01037
Plaintiff:
DONALD BARBER and VALERIE BARBER
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC., HOME DEPOT USA, INC., THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
