Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03649
Plaintiff:
Donna Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Dagnall et al v. Arbonne Inernational, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv01214
Defendant:
Arbonne Inernational, LLC, CA, Tarrah Brandsma, Cassandra House and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Dagnall and Michael Dagnall
Henry Holmes v. Becky Dugan, et al
as 17-55923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
BECKY L. DUGAN, Riverside Superior Court Judge, CYNTHIA BREWER, Riverside County District Attorney, DONNA JOHNSON, Public Defender and others
Henry James Holmes v. Becky L. Dugan et al
as 5:2016cv02608
Defendant:
Heath Baker, Board Of Supervisors, Cynthia Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Holmes v. Dugan et al
as 3:2016cv02687
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
Becky L. Dugan, Cynthia Brewer, Donna Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06640
Plaintiff:
Donna Johnson and Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05005
Plaintiff:
DONNA JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Donna Johnson
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30143
Plaintiff:
Donna Johnson and John Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00835
Plaintiff:
Norman Simpson and Donna Johnson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
