Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DRESSER v. DOROTHEA DIX BEHAVIORAL PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2018cv00425
Defendant:
DOROTHEA DIX BEHAVIORAL PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, DIRECTORS OF DDH and STATE OF MAINE
Plaintiff:
JAY P L DRESSER
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBBS v. DIX et al
as 1:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
KIPP R GIBBS
Defendant:
DOROTHEA DIX and STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Dix et al
as 1:2011cv10595
Plaintiff:
Kipp R. Gibbs
Defendant:
Dorothea Dix and State of Maine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tollerson v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00474
Plaintiff:
Javon Christopher Tollerson
Defendant:
The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants Inc., Associates of mine, Managers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freddie Raynor v. Bob Rollin
as 10-1618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE N. RAYNOR
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB ROLLINS, (Wake County), FRED WURTERS, MONA BHATTI and others
Raynor v. Bob Rollins (Wake County) et al
as 5:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Freddie Raynor
Defendant:
Bob Rollins (Wake County), Fred Wurters, Mona Bhatti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Nobles v. Dorothea Dix Hospital
as 5:2007cv00381
Plaintiff:
Milton W. Nobles
Defendant:
Dorothea Dix Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
