Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 820
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner: Timothy James Thomas
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff: Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner: Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Schuppan v. Beth Cabell
as 24-6329
Petitioner: GEORGE ZACHARY SCHUPPAN
Respondent: BETH CABELL, Warden, Sussex II State Prison and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Ryan Turner v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6323
Petitioner: RYAN MARTEZ TURNER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Jerrell Edwards v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6318
Petitioner: JERRELL CORTEZ EDWARDS
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Proffit v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00232
Petitioner: Richard M. Proffit
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beal v. Greenman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00495
Plaintiff: Camarion Beal
Defendant: Andrew Greenman, Sam Dotson, Gregory Klipsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff: Jacorey King
Defendant: Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant: David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?