Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Andrew Dunlevy v. James Langfelder, et al
as 21-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW DUNLEVY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES O. LANGFELDER, DOUG BROWN, JOHN DAVIS and others
Index Newspapers LLC, et al v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 20-35739
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUSTIN YAU, and those similarly situated, ALEX MILAN TRACY, BRIAN CONLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; and JOHN DOES, 1-60; individual and supervisory officers of Portland Police Bureau and other agencies working in concert,
Amicus Curiae:
THE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH AND REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AND 14 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
Coleman et al v. Affordable Care, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10707
Defendant:
Affordable Health Care, Inc., Doug Brown, David Slezak and others
Plaintiff:
Charles T Coleman
Not Yet Classified:
Charles T. Coleman, DMD, A Professional Dental Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Davern et al
as 1:2016cv02901
Petitioner:
D.R. HORTON, INC. and Doug Brown
Respondent:
NVR, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Davern et al
as 1:2016mc00009
Petitioner:
D.R. HORTON, INC. and Doug Brown
Respondent:
NVR, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Davern et al
as 3:2016mc00053
Respondent:
Jonathan Davern and NVR, Inc.
Petitioner:
D.R. Horton, Inc. and Doug Brown
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
General Produce, Inc. v. Brown's Farmers Market, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
General Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Brown's Farmers Market, Inc., Doug Brown, Dennis Williamson and others
Pritchard Mining Company, Inc. v. Brown
as 2:2009cv00769
Plaintiff:
Pritchard Mining Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Doug Brown
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999 Report cause code (DO NOT DELETE!)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
