Cases 1 - 10 of 3,110
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Constant
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Douglas Constant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Montford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Turner
Defendant:
Montford Unit and Texas Tech University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schubert v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Shannon W. Phelps, James Wills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kennedy v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
David M Kennedy, Jr
Defendant:
Douglas Wheeler, Stephen Dean, Gary Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Legacy Recovery Svc v. City of Monroe
as 24-30211
Plaintiff:
Legacy Recovery Service, L.L.C., doing business as Legacy House, Colburn Sullivan, Joe Montgomery and others
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Friday Ellis, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Monroe, City Council of Monroe and others
Lee et al v. R&R Home Care, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Douglas A Lee, II and Ashlynn Estay
Defendant:
R&R Home Care, Inc., Medical Brokers Management, Inc. and Jay Weil, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Medlow v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Barron Douglas Medlow
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Medlow v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Barron Douglas Medlow
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
