Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wallace v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv01192
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Douglas Stewart Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Douglas F. Wallace v. Vincent J. Patterson
as 3:2019cv04258
Defendant:
Vincent James Patterson
Plaintiff:
Douglas Faminow Wallace
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Penoyer v. Russell et al
as 8:2018cv01008
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Penoyer
Defendant:
James T. Russell, B. J. Driver, Joseph Donahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell Kiser v. Lili Reitz, et al
as 15-3335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KISER, D.D.S., M.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
LILI REITZ, MARYBETH D. SHAFFER, JACINTO BEARD and others
Russell Kiser v. Lili Reitz, et al
as 13-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL KISER, D.D.S., M.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
LILI REITZ, MARYBETH D. SHAFFER, JACINTO BEARD and others
Douglas Wallace v. Willard Romney, et al
as 13-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLARD MITT ROMNEY, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and LYNNE M. HALBROOKS
Kiser v. Reitz et al
as 2:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Russell Kiser
Defendant:
Lili Reitz , Marybeth D Shaffer , Jacinto W Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Romney
as 3:2012cv00167
Defendant:
Lynne M. Halbrooks, Eric Holder and Willard Mitt Romney
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kalniz v. Ohio State Dental Board et al
as 2:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Scott Kalniz, DDS
Defendant:
Ohio State Dental Board, Mark T. Armstrong, DDS, Billie Sue Kyger, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. WALLACE
as 4:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILSON
Defendant:
DOUGLAS G WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
