Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CARLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08835
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CARLSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prince Jones v. DC, et al
as 21-5306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prince Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, Todd Perkins and others
Prince Jones v. Todd Perkins, et al
as 21-7137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prince Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Todd Perkins, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Elbert Griffin, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Douglas Carlson, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and others
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv03117
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Jones
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Jones v. DC, et al
as 21-7011
Defendant / Appellee:
Elbert Griffin, District of Columbia, Jennifer Anderson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prince Jones
Carlson v. NTN Buzztime, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Michael Gottlieb, Richard Simtob, Allen Wolff and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Carlson
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv01167
Defendant:
DANYA A. DAYSON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DETENTION FACILITY, JENNIFER ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JONES v. PERKINS et al
as 1:2019cv03168
Defendant:
TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM, ELBERT GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLSON et al v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00915
Plaintiff:
ROBIN CARLSON and DOUGLAS CARLSON
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
