Cases 1 - 10 of 56
United States of America v. White
as 24-529
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL DOUGLAS WHITE
White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 6:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Douglas White
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pananyan v. White
as 1:2022at00984
Petitioner:
Arsen Pananyan
Respondent:
Douglas White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Pananyan v. White
as 1:2022cv01613
Petitioner:
Arsen Pananyan
Respondent:
Douglas White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC)Gelazela v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gelazela
Defendant:
United States of America, Douglas White, D. Blocher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gelazela v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gelazela
Defendant:
United States of America, Douglas White, D. Blocher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17159
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WHITE
Defendant:
3M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13513
Plaintiff:
LEE DOUGLAS WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Gelazela v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Mark Gelazela
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Douglas White, D. Blocher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
