Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Dowdell v. Gaines
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Tamika Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Bey v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Defendant:
Brittany Quiera Austin and Anita L Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lynch v. Filice et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Defendant:
Maureen Lynch, Randazzo Filice, Marcela Filice and others
Plaintiff:
Anne Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hill et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hill, Stephen Donald Delcuze, Julio Delgado and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dowdell v. Byrd et al.
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Nailah K. Byrd, Leslie Celebrezze, Ditko Devione and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dowdell v. Gaines et al.
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Tamika Gaines, Ditko Bevione and Nailah Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crawford v. Ladnier et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dowdell v. Sauer Brands Inc.
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
David Dowdell
Defendant:
Sauer Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dowdell v. L'Oreal USA Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Gloria Dowdell
Defendant:
Loreal USA Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
