Cases 1 - 10 of 42
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anaya v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv15445
Plaintiff:
Jesus E Anaya
Defendant:
Vaughn E Russell, K. Haynes, Niccoelle E. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Conley
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Dr. B. Mullins, MD, Dr. H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Batista et al
as 1:2023cv01619
Defendant:
Doctor Batista, Dr B, N.P. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Florida Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Ivan Ramirez
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Corrections, Centurion Medical Services of Florida, LLC, Lisa Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mendez v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Ramon Eddie Mendez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Dr B, D. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Davis v. B. Thakkar
as 22-6721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN L. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. B. N. THAKKAR
Diarra v. Boyd et al
as 1:2021cv03291
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Karen Boyd and Dr. B. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Carl Manis, Officer M. Woodard, Sergeant Mr. Pauley and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willard v. Scanlon et al
as 3:2021cv02011
Defendant:
R.N. Crosby, Sgt. Vick, R Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Willard, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
