Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Austin v. Dr. Barnes et al
as 3:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lavon Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Barnes, E. Valerio, G. Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00113
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, c/o Bachnon, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dave Williams v. B. Jin
as 17-1759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. B. JIN
Alton Brown v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 16-4136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, CORIZON HEALTH INC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Parker v. Lash et al
as 2:2016cv01231
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Parker
Defendant:
CO Lash , Brian Foster, William Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn Monroe v. John Doe, et al
as 16-20503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAUGHN MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, I - Director - University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas, DR. L. LINTHICUM, Medical Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Huntsville, Texas and others
Randall Keystone v. B. Mullin
as 16-6764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL J. KEYSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. B. MULLINS, MD and MRS. V. PHIPPS, Director of Nursing at Red Onion State Medical
Major v. Miami-Dade Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv20839
Plaintiff:
James Major
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Corrections, Corporal Paul, Dep. Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Ulep et al
as 1:2015cv01635
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brooks
Defendant:
Dr. B. Ulep, A. Baldwin and L Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Dr. B et al
as 1:2015cv10443
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sims
Defendant:
Dr. B and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
