Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Scott, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robert Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency Administration and APA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitney v. Corbin et al
as 4:2023cv10450
Plaintiff:
Harrison Whitney
Defendant:
Susan R. Corbin, Mhammad Elminini, US Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Adams v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2022cv11024
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Mary Adams Semcken, Susan Kay Adams and others
Adu-Beniako v. Medical Board of California (MDC) et al
as 2:2021cv11329
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), American Medical Association (AMA), Cheryl Wykoff Pezon and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Adu-Beniako
Kiser v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Kiser
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., United States of America, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Adu-Beniako v. Reimann et al
as 4:2020cv12402
Plaintiff:
Solomon Adu-Beniako
Defendant:
Patrick Reimann and Drug Enforcement Agency
Adams v. Semcken et al
as 1:2020cv11954
Defendant:
Julie A. Gafkay, Barry Rumble, Fred L. Borchard and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Bartlett v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1109
Bartlett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Allegan County Court, Kalamazoo County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2016cv01288
Plaintiff:
John B Woods
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
