Cases 21 - 30 of 30
MEADOWS v. DOE
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MEADOWS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salgado v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
Israel Salgado
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guillermo Salazar v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 11-11877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO SANCHEZ SALAZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION (FBI) and others
Cole v. U. S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2011cv01223
Plaintiff:
James T. Cole, Jr.
Defendant:
U. S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, Willie Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harsh Sharma v. Drug Enforcement Agency, et al
as 11-10963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSH SHARMA
Defendant - Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Dawson v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 0:2011cv60425
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dawson
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Sharma v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 1:2010cv20508
Plaintiff:
Harsh Sharma
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency , United States Attorney General , United States Marshall Service and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell et al v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 2:2009mc01034
Plaintiff:
Martin R. Burrell, Marcellus Hogan and Jeremiah David Walker
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Jenkins v. United States of America et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00983
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Todd Brown, U.S. Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 8:2007cv01432
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
