Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rice v. Scholastic Book Fairs, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01293
Plaintiff:
Richard Rice, Jr.
Defendant:
Scholastic Book Fairs, Inc., Karen Duffy and Stafford County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv02213
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Berri A. Wells
Defendant:
Maryland Higher Education Commission, STATE OF MARYLAND, University of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Bardes v. L. Auld
as 15-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer
Defendant - Appellee:
L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge, CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge, PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior U.S. District Judge and others
Bardes v. Auld et al
as 1:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
David A. Bardes
Defendant:
L. Patrick Auld, Catherine C. Eagles, Patrick Michael Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald L. Morrison v. Wayne R. Myer
as 15-1155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE R. MYERS, GEORGE B. CURRIN, STEPHEN AUBREY WEST and others
Morrison v. Myers et al
as 7:2014cv00085
Defendant:
Wayne R. Myers, George B. Currin, Stephen A. West and others
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayhew v. Duffy
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Banks Mayhew
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
