Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Tim Edwards Refrigeration, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tim Edwards Refrigeration, Inc.
Defendant:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dollar Phone Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet Corporation
as 13-1428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dollar Phone Corp. and Global Switching, Inc., individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Lakeview Bus Lines, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02541
Defendant:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lakeview Bus Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-11060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O&R Construction, LLC v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02184
Plaintiff:
O&R Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation , Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Dun & Bradstreet Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
DOMUS, INC. v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.
as 2:2012cv00837
Plaintiff:
DOMUS, INC.
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martin
Defendant:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. and Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dun & Bradstreet Inc v. Brimberry et al
as 1:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Dun & Bradstreet Inc
Defendant:
Kevin Brimberry and Equifax Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
