Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Jack v. Michael Chapman
as 17-6326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. JACK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, Sheriff, Loudoun County Sheriff's Department, DETECTIVE SEAN DIKEMAN, Loudoun County Sheriff's Department, DEPUTY RIMA, Loudoun County Sheriff's Department and others
Jack v. Chapman et al
as 3:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
James L. Jack
Defendant:
Michael L. Chapman, Sean Dikeman, Deputy Rima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Heffner et al
as 2:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Harold Clark
Defendant:
Don Heffner, Alan Earls, Bill Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunseith v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00971
Plaintiff:
Brina J. Dunseith, Brina J. Dunseith and Brina J. Dunseith
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Torts - Injury
Dunseith v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
Brina J. Dunseith
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Roy Harris v. Jim Moore, et al
as 08-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Eugene Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Jim Moore, Superintendent, Northeast Correctional Center, Mary Reardon, Assistant Superintendent, Northeast Correctional Center, James Gammon, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional and others
Roy Harris v. Jim Moore, et al
as 08-1800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Eugene Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Jim Moore, Superintendent, Northeast Correctional Center, Mary Reardon, Assistant Superintendent, Northeast Correctional Center, James Gammon, Superintendent, Moberly Correctional and others
Brooks v. Cousins et al
as 2:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ronnie G. Brooks
Defendant:
Unknown Cousins, Unknown Hayes, Lyle Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
