Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Todrick Morris v. Augustine Melendrez, et al
as 17-10381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODRICK MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTINE MELENDREZ, Correctional Supervisor, ANASTASIO P. MADRID, Correctional Supervisor, DUSTIN ANDERSON, Correctional Supervisor and others
Rodgers Patrick v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Dolores Rodgers Patrick
Defendant:
Barry Martin, James Beach, Rowdy Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv01885
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Sullivan
Defendant:
Dustin Anderson, Megan Anderson, Cynthia Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Nevin
as 2:2015cv02245
Petitioner:
Dustin Anderson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Anderson et al
as 2:2015cv13852
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Dustin Anderson, Scott Arp, Noah Beesley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Romano v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02839
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Romano
Defendant:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company, Windy Hill Foliage, Inc. and Dustin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Jones v. Dustin Anderson
as 15-10514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN ANDERSON, Sergeant
Morris v. Melendrez et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Augustine Melendrez, Anastasio P Madrid, Dustin Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julius Evans v. M. Phommahaxay, et al
as 15-10131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS CURTIS EVANS, also known as Julius Evans, also known as Julius C. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
M. L. PHOMMAHAXAY, BRAD LIVINGSTON, BARRY L. MARTIN and others
Evans v. Phommahaxay et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
M L Phommahaxay, Brad Livingston, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
