Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Parker v. PwC et al
as 1:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Andrew Parker
Defendant:
PwC, Deloitte, US Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coffman v. Vinita Forensic Center Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv02308
Defendant:
Sandra Tryson, Jason Morgan, Jonathan Brodrick and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin David Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
HEESE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13188
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN DAVID LEONARD HEESE and DUSTIN D HESSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11003
Plaintiff:
Dustin David Lee Brown
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boetel v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00172
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dustin David Boetel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Dustin Boetel
as 20-2519
Defendant / Appellant:
Dustin David Boetel
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Dorgan v. USA
as 2:2014cv00743
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dustin David Dorgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
