Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Lakefield Place Development LLC v. Ohio Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2026cv00363
Plaintiff:
Lakefield Place Development LLC
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Transportation, Dustin Williams, Director of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Mahoney et al
as 3:2026cv01113
Plaintiff:
Sirkeameo Vandrell Johnson
Defendant:
Ryan Mahoney, Anthony Cowan, Dustin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Williams et al
as 6:2025cv03256
Plaintiff:
Kevin Diante Benton
Defendant:
Dustin Williams and Sergeant Unknown Monteleone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2025cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ana Doe
Defendant:
Scotty Rhoden, Dustin Williams, Lieutenant Sharon Youmans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton v. Williams et al
as 4:2025cv01007
Plaintiff:
Kevin Diante Benton
Defendant:
Dustin Williams and Sargeant Unknown Monteleone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin Tomaszycki v. Adam Douglas
as 25-1555
Petitioner:
DUSTIN WILLIAM TOMASZYCKI
Respondent:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden
Dustin HensleyIn re: Dustin Hensley
as 24-3645
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: DUSTIN WILLIAM HENSLEY
SHELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13785
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN WILLIAM SHELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dustin William Mathews v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2023cv07132
Plaintiff:
Dustin William Mathews
Defendant:
City of El Monte, A. Fernandez, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall McElhaney v. Dustin Williams, et al
as 22-5903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL MCELHANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN WILLIAMS, WILLIAM STEPP, NATHAN BROWN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
