Cases 11 - 20 of 97
BOATMAN, HOLMES, MORRIS, SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOATMAN, MARQUES HOLMES, DAVID MORRIS and others
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DR. DAUSS, DENNIS REGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington et al v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2022cv04664
Plaintiff:
Sean Washington, Jermaine Miller, Shane Lundy-Bey and others
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13133
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DWAYNE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2022cv02671
Petitioner:
DWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shed v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 8:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shed
Defendant:
University of South Florida Board of Trustees, Dwayne Smith, Camille Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ed Dwayne Smith
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ed Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26147
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON DWAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04283
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Treitner, Cory M. Bynum, Dwayne Smith and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
