Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Randle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Does Agents, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risenhoover v. King et al
as 2:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
Polly Risenhoover
Defendant:
Zachary King, Joshua Winford, City of Dyer, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Scott
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Scott and Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yakimovicz et al
as 4:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Yakimovicz, Arender, Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeClaire v. Dyer et al
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael LeClaire
Defendant:
Deputy Richard Dyer and Deputy Brandon Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv02203
Plaintiff:
David Allen Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson, Sergeant Brandon Hicks, Sergeant Dylan Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Roberts et al
as 4:2020cv01174
Defendant:
Kendra Roberts, Pulaski County Arkansas, Buddy Villines and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Dievernich et al
as 4:2018cv00492
Defendant:
Maxine Ellison, Kylan Terry, Pillow Clinic PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
