Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Durham et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01477
Plaintiff: Stanley E. Durham and Joyce A. Durham
Defendant: Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
DURHAM v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: JAMES E. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant: DENNID REAGLE, YOLANDA CHAMBERS and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durham v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff: Megan E. Durham
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
James Durham v. Dushan Zatecky
as 21-3151
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES E. DURHAM
Respondent / Appellee: DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
DURHAM v. ZATECKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02398
Petitioner: JAMES E. DURHAM
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant: Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff: Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Beck v. CafePress Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01694
Defendant: Kenneth T. McBride, Mary Ann Arico, Anthony C. Allen and others
Plaintiff: Henri Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franchi v. CafePress Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01620
Defendant: Kenneth T. McBride, Snapfish Merger Sub, Inc., Anthony C. Allen and others
Plaintiff: Adam Franchi
Bushansky v. CafePress Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01607
Defendant: Kenneth T. McBride, Mary Ann Arico, Anthony C. Allen and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
DURHAM v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv04079
Petitioner: JAMES E. DURHAM
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?