Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Brooks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Kathleen E. Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Brooks v. Topaz Super Carwash et al
as 2:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Zalton E Brooks
Defendant:
Topaz Super Carwash and Bruno Bernada, Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daimler Truck North America LLC et al v. B&E Brooks, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
Daimler Truck North America LLC, Thomas Built Buses, Inc. and Detroit Diesel Corporation
Defendant:
B&E BROOKS, INC., Eric J. Brooks and B&E Brooks, Inc. an Oregon corporation doing business as Branding Merchandise
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Brooks v. Topez Super Car Wash et al
as 2:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Zalton E Brooks
Defendant:
Topez Super Car Wash, Bauno and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 20-35805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and JOHN SWING
Harkins v. Sutter County et al
as 2:2020cv00347
Defendant:
California Forensics Medical Group, Brandon Barnes, Doris Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Harkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Davis v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 17-35943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ADAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary and Assistant Secretary, G. HAMMOND, Medical Director, ADA COORDINATOR, WA State Dept of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brooks v. Strong
as 3:2016cv05535
Plaintiff:
John E Brooks
Defendant:
Mark Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
