Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Platte River Insurance Company v. Clayton College of Natural Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02751
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Clayton College of Natural Health, Inc., Alabama Department of Postsecondary Education and Lloyd E Clayton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windsor v. Huber et al
as 1:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Christopher Huber , Sally Quillian Yates, William S. Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Windsor v. Thrash et al
as 1:2011cv02027
Defendant:
Thomas Woodrow Thrash , Christopher Huber , William S. Duffey and others
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doll, Jr. v. Boh Brothers Construction Co., LLC
as 2:2011cv01090
Defendant:
Boh Brothers Construction Co., LLC
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Doll, Jr.
Intervenor:
Ben E Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Daker v. Warren et al
as 1:2011cv01401
Petitioner:
Waseem Daker
Respondent:
Neil Warren, Richard W. Story and E. Clayton Scofield, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Clayton
as 2:2011mc09006
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Marvin E Clayton
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Mark Clayton v. United State
as 11-1603
Petitioner:
Mark E. Clayton
Respondent:
United States of America
Clayton v. Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
James E Clayton
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Mary Fallin, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Clayton et al
as 1:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Christine L. Clayton, Frank E Clayton, Earthmover Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv04449
Plaintiff:
Patricia E Clayton
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
