Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Waxler v. All Green Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Gage Waxler
Defendant:
All Green Transport, LLC, Charles E Fisher and Charles E. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Leonard v. Wood et al
as 3:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Mark Leonard, Lester E. Fisher and Randy Kelly
Defendant:
W. Wood and Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. IonQ, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Fisher
Defendant:
IonQ, Inc., Peter Chapman and Thomas Kramer
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05894
Plaintiff:
APRIL E. FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
USA v. Andrew Fisher
as 21-11879
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW E. FISHER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01691
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL E. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99709
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVE E FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93146
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
