Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Beeson et al v. Anderson County Planning Commission
as 8:2020cv03027
Plaintiff:
J and E Holdings LLC, Joseph M Beeson, Joseph AC and others
Defendant:
Anderson County Planning Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
XXIII Capital Limited v. Decade, S.A.C., LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01770
Defendant:
Aaron Goodwin, Eric Goodwin, Gotham S&E Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
XXIII Capital Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beeson Development LLC et al v. Beeson et al
as 8:2018cv01318
Plaintiff:
Beeson Development LLC , J and E Holdings LLC and Joseph C Beeson
Defendant:
Anderson County, Ed Dutton, Lonnie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
XXIII Capital Limited v. Decade, S.A.C., LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06910
Plaintiff:
XXIII Capital Limited
Defendant:
Decade, S.A.C., LLC , Decade, S.A.C. Contracts, LLC , Decade, S.A.C. I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betco Corporation v. Malcolm Peacock, et al
as 17-1133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETCO CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
MALCOLM D. PEACOCK, MARILYN PEACOCK, B. HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and others
Lake v. Southgate, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10251
Defendant:
Southgate, City of , Hysen Elmazaj, H & E Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Betco Corporation, Ltd. v. Peacock et al
as 3:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Betco Corporation, Ltd.
Defendant:
Malcolm D. Peacock , Marilyn Peacock , B. Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00365
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00366
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
