Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Smith v. Legacy Investments of Brandon, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Smith
Defendant:
Legacy Investments of Brandon, Inc., Phoenix Capital Funding Inc., Phoenix Landing Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTORS CO., INC.
as 1:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
CELESTE E. SMITH and BRIAN G. SMITH
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTORS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. McDonough
as 5:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Harriette E. Smith
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corbett v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03361
Defendant:
Officer Holmes, Mr. Ballard, Sgt. Brounson and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Johnson Controls Security Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Johnson Controls Security Solutions, LLC, Designco Construction, Inc., Michael Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Langley et al v. Smith Turf & Irrigation, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00619
Defendant:
Wayne Smith, Jr, Smith Turf & Irrigation, LLC, Stephen E Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Langley, Paul Maull, IV and William A Powell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HUDSON v. REVELS et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
WHITNEY DANIELLE REVELS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SLOAN
as 1:2017cv00684
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMRON SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
