Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wilcock v. Knudsen
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
E.B. Wilcock
Respondent:
Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Judson Todd Evans
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devin Atwood, Turnkey Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Page et al
as 5:2016ct03161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stout, Jr.
Defendant:
E.B. Page and Cary Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Wayne Ballard v. Marcellus Buchanan
as 16-6417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WAYNE BALLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCELLUS M. BUCHANAN, DONALD DAVID GAST, AUSA Asheville, NC, MARTIN K. REIDINGER, US District Court Judge at Bryson City, NC and others
Ballard v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
Marcellus Buchanan, Don Gast, Martin Reidinger and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. United States et al
as 5:2014ct03060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jomell Perry
Defendant:
United States, George E.B. Holding, Yvonne V. Watford-Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartko v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2014ct03043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bartko
Defendant:
Clay Campbell Wheeler, Scott B. Hollenbeck, George E.B. Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTKO v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant:
CLAY CAMPBELL WHEELER, SCOTT B. HOLLENBECK, GEORGE E.B. HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gaddy v. E.B. Sherman, et al
as 13-16981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GADDY
Defendant - Appellee:
E.B. SHERMAN, Lieutenant, J. WELLS, Sergeant, R. GUERRA and others
Boykin v. Holding et al
as 5:2013ct03208
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boykin, Jr.
Defendant:
George E.B. Holding, Jim Johnston, Lucy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
