Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jennifer Koutsouftikis, individually and as parent and next friend to minor Plaintiff E.K., v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Koutsouftikis, individually and as parent and next friend to minor Plaintiff E.K.,
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Instagram, LLC, and Siculus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitter et al v. Glover et al
as 3:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Lester E. Specht, Bradley Halladay, E.K. Bare & Sons, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth Mitter
Interested Party:
B. K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Draper v. United States District Court for the Western District of VA et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Euron Draper
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Western District of VA and Judge Dillon E.K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rogers v. New Hanover County et al
as 5:2020ct03013
Defendant:
E.K. Edwards, D. Wenk, Sheriff Edward McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
James Carlyle Williams, Jr., David M. Pascoe, Jr., Diane Shafer Goodstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. NC DPS Prisons et al
as 5:2016ct03325
Plaintiff:
James J. James
Defendant:
NC DPS Prisons, George T. Solomon, Hilary Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley
as 14-7622
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE
Respondent - Appellee:
E.K. CAULEY, Warden
Lionell Ephraim v. E.K. Cauley
as 14-6535
Petitioner - Appellant:
LIONELL ELIJAH EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
E.K. CAULEY, Warden
Kareem Currence v. E.K. Cauley
as 13-7732
Petitioner - Appellant:
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE
Respondent - Appellee:
E.K. CAULEY, Warden
Implus Footcare, LLC v. It's running e.K.
as 5:2012cv00794
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
It's running e.K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
