Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jane Doe PNA (E.P.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv09432
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (E.P.)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA, LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sarunas Pletkus v. Ana Saletis
as 26-12795
Petitioner:
SARUNAS PLETKUS, Acting on behalf of infant child, E.P.
Respondent:
ANA SALETIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
E.P v. G6 Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv02610
Plaintiff:
E.P
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, LLC and Motel 6 Operating, L.P.
Unknown:
Andersen, Tate & Carr P.C.
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
E.P v. G6 Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2026mi00082
Plaintiff:
E.P
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, LLC and Motel 6 Operating, L.P.
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04759
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
E.P. et al v. Medvi, LLC
as 2:2026cv03796
Plaintiff:
E.P., J.S., M.A. and others
Defendant:
Medvi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bryan Pennington, et al v. Carl Hefner, et al
as 25-3374
Plaintiff:
Bryan O. Pennington, Tylla Pennington, E.P., next friend Bryan O. Pennington and others
Defendant:
Carl Hefner, Stoddard County, Rodger Seal and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01559
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
