Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Brull v. Howard et al
as 5:2026cv03119
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Brull
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Dr. Lindsey Dinkle-Topps, Haleigh Bennett-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. TK Health et al
as 2:2026cv00295
Plaintiff:
Paul Ebbert Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
TK Health, P Thao, B Laurent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zou v. Ebberts et al
as 2:2025cv02231
Plaintiff:
Bo Zou
Defendant:
Steven R. Ebberts, Teresa L. Watson and Marla Luckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-10435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hollins (ID 81750) et al v. KDOC Staff
as 5:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Butler and Ricky L. Hollins, Jr.
Defendant:
KDOC Staff, Michael Ebberts, Dakota Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Defendant:
RYAN SMITH, Case Manager, JAMES FOSNOT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
EBBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18560
Plaintiff:
BRYAN EBBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv13532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
