Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cooper v. Health Service Administrator et al
as 1:2026cv00855
Plaintiff:
Da' Ante Vance Cooper
Defendant:
Health Service Administrator, Medical, JCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ECI Software Solutions, Inc. v. Essendant Co.
as 1:2026cv02406
Plaintiff:
ECI Software Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Essendant Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brian Moore v. US
as 26-6058
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. MOORE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, ECI Cumberland, OFFICER ROBERT DAWSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PanoVision LLC v. ECI Software Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2025cv00069
Plaintiff:
PanoVision LLC
Defendant:
ECI Software Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
112 Genesee Street, LLC v. US
as 25-1373
Plaintiff:
112 GENESEE STREET, LLC, 1233 POLK STREET, LLC, 1490 RESTAURANT, INC. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
112 Genesee Street, LLC v. US
as 25-108
Respondent:
AADI INVESTMENTS LLC, 7SKI, INC., 66 TO GO LLC and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Gierczyk v. Olympus Peak Trade Claims Opportunities Fund I Non-ECI Master LP
as 1:2024cv07708
Plaintiff:
Alexander Nikolas Gierczyk
Defendant:
Olympus Peak Trade Claims Opportunities Fund I Non-ECI Master LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lee v. Warden BCDC et al
as 1:2024cv02577
Defendant:
ECI Chief of Security, Chief Medical Official BCDC, Chief of Security BCDC and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling Jamicek Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
