Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedigo v. Leman et al
as 4:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Pedigo
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Leman, Correctional Officer Shine, Correctional Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agakpe v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Prosper Atsu Agakpe
Defendant:
Edmond Sims and EEOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Edmond v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00857
Plaintiff:
Michael Edmond
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rochelle v. Ulrich et al
as 4:2020cv04043
Plaintiff:
Edmond Shackleford Rochelle and Ford
Defendant:
Pro Trucking, Inc. and David Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmond v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00677
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Marshel et al
as 3:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller
Defendant:
Trish Marshel, Doyle Ramey, Alex Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayworth v. White et al
as 4:2018cv04152
Defendant:
Deputy Ewing, Figuerroa, Lieutenant Maxwell and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Edmond Hayworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayworth v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2018cv04149
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR and Lieutenant Maxwell
Plaintiff:
Roy Edmond Hayworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
