Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In the Matter of the Complaint of Edward Carrington
as 8:2019cv01395
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Edward Carrington and Edward Carrington
Defendant:
Unknown Potential Claimants and Markel American Insurance Company, a/s/o Waves Boat & Social Club, LLC
Claimant:
Deborah Overman-Plante, Annie Malka and Laura B. Mouat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
US v. Denard Carrington
as 14-7055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DENARD EDWARD CARRINGTON, a/k/a Bird
Aguilar v. Equinox Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01007
Plaintiff:
Elsa Aguilar and Claudia Polanco
Defendant:
Edward Carrington, Luisa Dinenno and Equinox Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carrington v. USA
as 3:2011cv00670
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Denard Edward Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Denard Carrington
as 11-6795
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DENARD EDWARD CARRINGTON, a/k/a Bird
Edward Carrington v. City of Durham
as 11-1465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
STEVEN W. CHALMERS, PATRICK BAKER, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF DURHAM, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN and others
Edward Carrington v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
