Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Scott, et al v. County of Kern, et al
as 1:2024at00298
Plaintiff:
Dianna Scott and Keaton Edward Monroe
Defendant:
County of Kern and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott, et al v. County of Kern, et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Dianna Scott and Keaton Edward Monroe
Defendant:
County of Kern and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONROE et al v. FTS USA, LLC et al
as 2:2022mc00047
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MONROE, FABIAN MOORE and TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FTS USA, LLC and UNITEK USA, LLC
Monroe, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04073
Plaintiff:
George Edward Monroe, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edward Monroe, et al v. FTS USA, LLC, et al
as 20-6347
Defendant / Appellant:
FTS USA, LLC and UNITEK USA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FABIAN MOORE, TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees and EDWARD MONROE
Edward Monroe, et al v. FTS USA, LLC, et al
as 20-6289
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITEK USA, LLC and FTS USA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD MONROE, TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees and FABIAN MOORE
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
US v. Joseph Monroe
as 15-6747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARDS MONROE, a/k/a Slim
Monroe v. Sutton et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Edward Monroe
Defendant:
Tommie Sutton , Cathy Sutton , Daniel Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Joseph Monroe
as 15-6425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH EDWARDS MONROE, a/k/a Slim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
