Cases 41 - 50 of 66
COON v. WOOD et al
as 1:2013cv01400
Plaintiff:
JOHN COON
Defendant:
EDWARD WOOD , BROOK MEYER and CITY HOUSES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grace Adams, et al v. Springleaf Financial Service/, et al
as 13-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACE ADAMS
Plaintiff:
RONALD KERKSTRA, JAMES JETSON, JR., MATTHEW CRUISE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINGLEAF FINANCIAL SERVICE/AIG, fka Wilmington Finance/AIG, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND, LAMCO and others
US v. Bruce Wood
as 13-6084
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE EDWARD WOODS
Ceballos et al v. WMS Solutions LLC et al
as 8:2012cv03117
Plaintiff:
Luis Ceballos , Marvin Blandon , Luis Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
WMS Solutions LLC, Lewis Edwards Woodings and Paulo Fernandes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jetson v. Woods et al
as 4:2012cv01393
Plaintiff:
James Jetson , Jr.
Defendant:
Lee Edward Woods, Jr., Equistar Chemicals, L.P. , Ballard Exploration Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Woods v. USA
as 5:2012cv80401
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bruce Edward Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams et al v. Springleaf Financial Service/AIG et al
as 4:2012cv10308
Plaintiff:
Grace Ellis Adams, Ronald Kerkstra, James Jetson, Jr and others
Defendant:
Springleaf Financial Service/AIG, US Bank NA/U.S. Bancorp , LAMCO and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Howard R. Griffin United States of America
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Grace Ellis Adams
SAMSUNG METRO PCS, Model #SCH-R360, seized from Edward Woods on May 23, 2011
as 2:2011mj01242
Defendant:
SAMSUNG METRO PCS, Model #SCH-R360, seized from Edward Woods on May 23, 2011 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. SAMSUNG METRO PCS, Model #SCH-R360, seized from Edward Woods on May 23, 2011
as 2:2011mj01242
Defendant:
SAMSUNG METRO PCS, Model #SCH-R360, seized from Edward Woods on May 23, 2011 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
