Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lyle v. EGS Financial Care, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03014
Defendant:
EGS Financial Care, Inc. and NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lyle
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parks v. EGS Financial Care Inc et al
as 6:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Parks
Defendant:
EGS Financial Care Inc, iEnergizer Inc and RGS Financial Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. EGS Financial Care, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
EGS Financial Care, Inc., First Contact, LLC, GC Services Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brancucio v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Brancucio
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., EGS Financial Care, Inc., GC Services Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Secondi v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Suzette Secondi
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and EGS Financial Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
