Cases 1 - 10 of 3,240
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Dept.
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKiver v. Sineweee et al
as 8:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Deandre Lashun McKiver
Defendant:
Sergeant Sineweee and Officer Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Lard v. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
as 4:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
