Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Ellis v. Brummett et al
as 2:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Chelsie Ellis
Defendant:
Drury Brummett and Lupus Superior, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ellis v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ellis
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Kimberly Adkins, Dale Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ellis v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Ray Ellis
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Jamie Earl Ellis
Respondent:
Teri Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flaugher v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Douglas William Flaugher
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Kristen Ellis Hilbrenner and Jon Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Falkenrath
as 2:2023cv04099
Petitioner:
Edward Ellis, III
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Nike USA, Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Maria Guadalupe Ellis
Defendant:
Nike USA, Inc and Nike Retail Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. The City of Blue Springs, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jessica Smith
Defendant:
City of Blue Springs, Missouri, Blue Springs Police Department, Steven Emberton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Ms Jessica L Smith
Defendant:
The City of Blue Springs, Missouri, Blue Springs Police Department, Mr. Steven Emberton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
