Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kevin Coit v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 25-2601
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SEC, M. ZAKEN, STINE and others
COIT v. HARRY et al
as 3:2025cv00183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, M. ZAKEN, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamar Cardwell v. Kenneth Hollibaugh, et al
as 25-1159
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ABBOTT, CAPTAIN BOWERS, CAPTAIN BOYER and others
Jamar Cardwell v. Kenneth Hollibaugh, et al
as 24-3059
Defendant:
SGT WILT, OWENS, LT WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Emeigh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02961
Plaintiff:
Perry Emeigh
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-SOMERSET FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, C/O MACHESKY, MR. CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, C/O MACHESKY, MR. CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Cavaluzzi et al v. County of Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv11067
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cavaluzzi, Lyndon C. Alleyne, Petr Andreenko and others
Defendant:
County of Sullivan and Nancy Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
