Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 575
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff: Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Intervenor: Jerry Scott Heidler and Warren King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02735
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant: Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsh v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff: Kirk Russell Marsh
Defendant: State of Utah, Michael Edwards and Dana Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff: The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff: Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant: Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pye v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: William James Pye
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROACH v. EMMONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: EARL ROACH
Defendant: WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. EMMONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: CHEZ RENALDO REED
Defendant: SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EMMONS
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner: Vince Martinez Harris
Respondent: Warden SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?