Cases 41 - 50 of 1,045
Johnson v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Johnson
Defendant:
Gason English, Aramark, Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ataul Shafeek v. Brian English
as 23-3347
Petitioner / Appellant:
ATAUL SHAFEEK
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN ENGLISH
Dontay Martin v. Brian English
as 23-3322
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONTAY D. MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN ENGLISH
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 0:2023cv62309
Plaintiff:
Tommy Yesbick
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland v. McCray et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Martize Kirkland
Defendant:
Justin McCray, Centuerion Health, Chad C. Crites and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. DOSEK et al
as 3:2023cv24733
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JACKSON
Defendant:
DOSEK, MICHOT, GUNNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 3:2023cv24735
Petitioner:
TOMMY YESBICK
Respondent:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
