Cases 31 - 40 of 123
TRUONG v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01750
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, RODRIC BRAY, TODD HUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Charles Benson v. State of Indiana, et al
as 22-2550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA and ERIC HOLCOMB
BRADY v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRADY
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHAW v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE UPSHAW
Defendant:
VANIHEL, JERRY SNYDER, PURCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
JONES, JR. v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, DR. DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENNINGS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00690
Plaintiff:
LEON JENNINGS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, GWENDOLYN HORTH, KRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIETEL v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. RIETEL, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, DAVID BULTER, RANDAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
