Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Buckley v. Ray et al
as 5:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant:
Keith Ray, Linda Card, Richard Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Hayes et al
as 2:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Vyron Wheeler
Defendant:
Anthony Hayes, Eric Holder and C V Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander/Ryahim v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles E Alexander/Ryahim, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Mark Pryor, Mike Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinones v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00099
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E Samuels, Jr, Harvey Lappin and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Quinones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Thompson et al
as 4:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Thompson, Price, Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. McCord et al
as 4:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Stacey E McCord , Daniel A Applegate , Susan Webber Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lockett et al v. USA et al
as 4:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Sicory Judah Lockett, Dasia M Lockett, Oneness Among People Int and others
Defendant:
USA, Eric Holder, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sayadi-Takhtehkar v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Sayadi-Takhtehkar
Defendant:
USA, T C Outlaw and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
