Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Miller v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Miller v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 23-7973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, ESQ.
Defendant / Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ALPHABET INC., GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP and others
Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07000
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Woodhouse, Esq.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Baltas v. Cook
as 3:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rollin Cook, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alava v. Lamanna et al
as 1:2020cv10276
Defendant:
Toni Antrobus, Amy Lamanna, Benny Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Princess Debbie Alava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hamlett et al
as 1:2019cv11097
Defendant:
Brad Hamlett, The Wrangler Gallery, The Solomon Family Trust and others
Plaintiff:
David Eric Miller
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 541
Miller v. Naugatuck et al
as 3:2016cv02073
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
Borough of Naugatuck , Christopher Edson , Nicholas Kehoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
