Cases 1 - 10 of 211
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. Occidental Fire and Casualty Company of North Carolina
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Eric Thomas and Dianne Thomas
Defendant:
Occidental Fire and Casualty Company of North Carolina
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
THOMAS v. QUARRIER et al
as 1:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
QUARRIER, KATHLEEN M. SIMONE, NANCY EVETTE SPURGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ERIC THOMAS HALL
Defendant:
SCOTTY RHODEN, ANDREW PAUL THAMES and JASON REEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06889
Plaintiff:
ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and SEAN M. HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10918
Plaintiff:
ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeremy Braulick v. Paul Rees, et al
as 23-35331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REES, ERIC THOMAS, JODY COZBY and others
KINARD v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KINARD, LAYWOOD MOLETTE, JONATHAN OVERFELT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
