Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Van Akin v. State of Kansas Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv00094
Defendant:
State of Kansas Corp. et al
Plaintiff:
Brian Van Akin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, et al et al
as 1:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, et al and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James Wolf v. City of Arnold
as 16-3997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Eugene Wolf
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Arnold, Missouri, et al.
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, et al. et al
as 1:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, et al., Reese McKinney and D.T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2016cv02578
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Roberson, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Minnesota , County of Hennepin , City of Minneapolis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Macy's Incorporation and Agents, et al
as 6:2016cv03044
Plaintiff:
Calvin Allen and McKinsey Christopher
Defendant:
Macy's Incorporation and Agents, et al and Battlefield Mall Security and Agents, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Theodis Brown v. STLCC Dist. Board
as 16-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodis Brown, STLCC Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
STLCC Dist. Board, et al
Hays v. The City of Gentry, Arkansas, et al et al
as 5:2015cv05311
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Hays
Defendant:
The City of Gentry, Arkansas, et al and The City of Highfill, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Kansas City Regional Transit et al
as 4:2015cv00877
Plaintiff:
Walter P Walker
Defendant:
Kansas City Regional Transit et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joiner v. Kensington Apartments Complex et al
as 0:2014cv03424
Plaintiff:
Eugene Vincent Joiner
Defendant:
Kensington Apartments Complex, Zane V. LLC, O-B Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
