Cases 1 - 10 of 22
DOWNS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv07886
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
EUGENE DOWNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downing v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2020cv04049
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Downing v. Keech et al
as 5:2020ct03209
Defendant:
Frank Mitchell, Lt. Jewel and T.W. Keech, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Chester Eugene Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWNS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31283
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK EUGENE DOWNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Eugene Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eugene Downs v. USA
as 16-5368
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DOWNS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
EUGENE DOWNS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Chester Downing
as 13-7661
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHESTER EUGENE DOWNING
US v. Chester Downing
as 13-7555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHESTER EUGENE DOWNING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2707
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
